Page 6 - #18120100101
P. 6

•  Ryotwari settlement was introduced in Bombay Deccan as a new revenue system.
                     In this system, revenue was directly settled with cultivator or ryot. Average income
                     from soil, revenue paying capacity of ryot was assessed and proportion of it was
                     fixed as share of the state. In this system, there was provision for resurvey of land
                     every 30 years.

               Revenue Demand and Peasant Debt:



                  •  Revenue demand was very high and when harvest were poor, it was impossible to
                     pay When peasant failed to pay revenue his crops were seized and fine was
                     imposed on the whole village. In 1830’s, prices fell sharply, famine struck and due
                     to this l/3rd of cat tle in deccan were killed and half of human population died. So
                     the problem became very severe, but the unpaid revenue mounted. In these
                     conditions many peasants deserted their village and migrated to new places.
                  •  To get over a troubled period, to purchase things for arrange marriages and to
                     start agriculture, peasant needed money. So they borrowed money from
                     moneylender. But once loan was taken, they were unable to pay it back. As debt
                     mounted and loan remained unpaid, peasant dependence on moneylender
                     increased.
                  •  By 1840’s, officials found that peasants were in alarming level of indebtness, so
                     they moderated the revenue demand slightly. By 1845, agricultural price
                     recovered steadily and peasants started expanding cultivation. But for the purpose
                     of expansion they needed money to buy seeds etc, so they again turned to
                     moneylender for money.

               The Experience of Injustice of the Peasants:


                  •  Peasants got deeper and deeper into debt and now they were utterly dependent
                     on moneylender for survival but now moneylenders were refusing their loan. Along
                     with this, there was customary rule that interest charged cannot be more than
                     principal amount of loan. But in colonial rule this law was broken and now ryots
                     started to see money lenders as devious and deceitful. They complained of
                     moneylenders manipulating laws and forging accounts.
                  •  To tackle this problem, British in 1859 passed Limitation Law that stated that loan
                     bond would have validity for 3 years only.
                  •  It was meant to check accumulation of interest. But moneylenders now forced ryot
                     to sign a new bound every 3 years in which total unpaid balance of last loan was
                     entered as principal amount and interest was charged on it.
                  •  In petitions to Deccan Riots commission, ryots
                  •  stated how moneylenders were suppressing and oppressing them by refusing to
                     give receipts when loan were paid back, entered fictitious figures in bond and
                     forced them to sign and put thumb impression on bonds or document about which
                     they had no idea and they were not able to read. Money lenders also acquired the
                     harvest at low price and ultimately took over property of peasant. They have no
                     choice because to survive they needed
                  •  loan but inoneylenders were not willing to give it without bonds.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8