Page 2 - Lessonnote_ Cultural Change
P. 2

Modern Framework of Change in Colonial India



                       According to Sociologist Satish Saberwal elaborated three aspects to the
                       modern framework of change in colonial India
                       1) Modes of Communication-

                       New technologies speeded up various forms of communication.
                       E.g- Printing press, telegraph, microphone , movement of people
                       through steamship and railways helped quick movement of new ideas.
                       2) Forms of Organisation-

                       Modern Social organisation like Brahmo Samaj, Arya Samaj debated,
                       discussed held meetings, translations of religious writings were done.
                       3) Nature of  new Ideas-  Ideas of liberalism and freedom e.g – ideas of

                       home making , marriage, new roles for mothers and daughters, new
                       ideas of self- conscious pride in Culture and tradition emerged.
                       Sanskritisation:

                       M.N  Srinivas  explained  the  concept  of  Sanskritisation  in  his  book
                       ‘Religion and Society among the Coorgs of South India’ to describe the

                       cultural mobility in the traditional caste structure of Indian society.
                       Sanskritisation is defined as the process by which a ‘low caste’ or tribe or
                       other group takes over the customs, rituals, beliefs, ideology and style of
                       life  of  a  high  and  in  particular,  a  twice-  born  (dwija)  caste.  –  Social

                       change in Modern India
                       Impact of Sanskritisation

                   ➢  Its influence can be seen in language literature, ideology, music, dance,
                       drama, style of life and ritual.
                   ➢  It is primarily a process that takes place within the Hindu space.

                   ➢  In those regions where a highly sanskritised caste was dominant, the
                       culture of the entire region underwent a certain amount of
                       sanskritisation.

                   ➢  In regions where the non-sanskritic castes were dominant . It was their
                       influence that was stronger. This can be termed the process of  De-
                       Sanskritisation.
                   ➢  Srinivas argued that ‘Sanskritisation of a group has usually the effect of

                       improving its position in the local caste hierarchy.’
                   ➢  It  normally  presupposes  either  an  improvement  in  the  economic  or
                       political  position  of  the  group  concerned  or  a  higher  group  self-

                       consciousness  resulting  from  its  contact  with  a  source  of  the  ‘Great
   1   2   3   4   5   6